{"id":341,"date":"2025-03-31T12:46:47","date_gmt":"2025-03-31T12:46:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/?page_id=341"},"modified":"2025-04-01T12:49:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-01T12:49:25","slug":"technology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/technology\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Technology as a planetary phenomenon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0\"><em>Bronislaw Szerszynski<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">In this talk, I firstly explore four possible interpretations of the use of the term &#8216;planetary&#8217; to describe contemporary technology: (i) that modern technology is increasingly globally distributed and networked, (ii) that technology is developing the dynamic characteristics of an autopoietic, self-steering planetary system, (iii) that technology &#8216;enframes&#8217; and thereby ontologically diminishes the planet and (iv) that technology in the broadest sense is&nbsp;<em>always already<\/em>&nbsp;planetary: that it has its roots, its conditions of possibility, in the very nature of what Nigel Clark and I (2021) call &#8216;planetary multiplicity&#8217; \u2013 the capacity and tendency of planets to constantly self-differentiate, to become other to themselves at all spatial and temporal scales.&nbsp; Secondly, I turn to the specific form that this always-already planetary technicity manifests in human life, using the concept of &#8216;earthly multitudes&#8217;: human collectives that have learned to work in skilful ways with processes of planetary self-differentiation.&nbsp; Thirdly, I turn to the distinctive evolutionary path taken by human technology, which has led to a contemporary technosphere that seems to follow its own endogenous and self-reproducing laws of development. Fourthly and finally, I explore how we might identify latent possibilities in the planetary present that indicate alternative planetary futures, involving new kinds of earthly multitude and different relations with technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:100px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Technology as a planetary phenomenon Bronislaw Szerszynski In this talk, I firstly explore four possible interpretations of the use of the term &#8216;planetary&#8217; to describe contemporary technology: (i) that modern technology is increasingly globally distributed and networked, (ii) that technology is developing the dynamic characteristics of an autopoietic, self-steering planetary system, (iii) that technology &#8216;enframes&#8217; and thereby ontologically diminishes the planet and (iv) that technology in the broadest sense is&nbsp;always already&nbsp;planetary: that it has its roots, its conditions of possibility, in the very nature of what Nigel Clark and I (2021) call &#8216;planetary multiplicity&#8217; \u2013 the capacity and tendency of planets to constantly self-differentiate, to become other to themselves at all spatial and temporal scales.&nbsp; Secondly, I turn to the specific form that this always-already planetary technicity manifests in human life, using the concept of &#8216;earthly multitudes&#8217;: human collectives that have learned to work in skilful ways with processes of planetary self-differentiation.&nbsp; Thirdly, I turn to the distinctive evolutionary path taken by human technology, which has led to a contemporary technosphere that seems to follow its own endogenous and self-reproducing laws of development. Fourthly and finally, I explore how we might identify latent possibilities in the planetary present that indicate alternative planetary futures, involving new kinds of earthly multitude and different relations with technology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-341","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=341"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":357,"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/341\/revisions\/357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nature-strikes-back.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}